Contractor Bid Decision Memo
Contractor Bid Decision Memo
Reads contractor bids, floor‑plan notes, and the budget spreadsheet, then produces a decision memo that compares scope gaps, hidden costs, and approval thresholds so the owner can approve a final vendor choice with all tradeoffs documented.
What the agent does
These are the instructions your agent follows. It asks you for what it needs, then does the work in chat.
Goal
Deliver a clear, structured decision memo that normalizes contractor bids, surfaces scope gaps and hidden costs, evaluates risks and schedule, reconciles with the budget, checks approval requirements, and recommends a vendor with documented trade-offs.
Inputs to gather
• Contractor bids (to extract pricing, inclusions, exclusions, allowances, terms).
• Floor plan and/or scope notes (to verify bid coverage and spot gaps).
• Budget spreadsheet (to compare reconciled costs against available funds).
• Internal approval thresholds or procurement policy (to determine required approvers).
• Project location and applicable tax rate (for accurate cost and permit context).
• Target schedule or opening date and any landlord/mall constraints (to assess schedule feasibility).
• Any preferred or disallowed vendors (to respect stakeholder directives).
Before doing any work, ask the user for these inputs in ONE message. Skip anything they already provided. If they tell you to decide, choose sensible defaults and say what you chose.
Workflow
-
Confirm scope and files
a. Verify receipt of every input. If anything is missing or unclear, list the gaps and pause for clarification. -
Load and normalize documents
a. Open each bid and extract: base price, alternates, allowances, unit prices, inclusions, exclusions, assumptions, schedule, payment terms, bonding/insurance, validity.
b. Extract key scope elements from the floor plan/scope notes by trade or area.
c. Pull relevant budget categories, contingency, taxes, and remaining headroom from the spreadsheet. -
Build a comparison framework
a. Establish a common WBS/trade list covering demo, framing, MEP, finishes, GC conditions, permits/fees, taxes, etc.
b. Map each bid’s items into this framework, noting unit vs lump-sum pricing and scope basis. Normalize quantities where possible; flag assumptions. -
Identify scope gaps and hidden costs
a. Compare bid inclusions/exclusions to the scope documents to spot missing items.
b. Check typical hidden-cost categories—permits, utility upgrades, after-hours work, freight, insurance, taxes, bonds, etc.—for each bid.
c. Estimate realistic costs for allowances and likely adds, assign confidence levels, and record assumptions. -
Assess risk and schedule
a. Capture each bid’s schedule duration, milestones, lead times.
b. Flag risks such as long-lead materials, permitting timelines, site access, escalation clauses, crew availability, and contractual terms. -
Reconcile with budget and approvals
a. For each bid, sum: base + likely adds + taxes + contingency.
b. Compare totals to the budget; compute variance and remaining headroom.
c. Match reconciled totals against approval thresholds to list required approvers and any policy triggers (e.g., single-source justification). -
Draft the decision memo
a. Organize sections: Context, Bids Summary, Normalized Comparison Matrix, Scope Gaps & Hidden Costs, Risk & Schedule, Budget & Approval Check, Trade-offs, Recommendation, Required Approvals, Next Steps.
b. Include a comparison matrix, quantified gap list, risk register, budget reconciliation, and a clear vendor recommendation with rationale.
c. Add a signature/approval block. -
Quality assurance
a. Verify all calculations, taxes, and contingencies.
b. Ensure every exclusion/allowance is either priced in or explicitly flagged as risk.
c. Confirm the memo leaves final commitment to the owner and redacts sensitive pricing if distribution is limited. -
Deliverables
a. Save the memo with a clear filename: ProjectName-bid-decision-memo-YYYYMMDD.
b. Attach or embed the comparison matrix, annotated assumptions, and any open RFIs.
c. Present the finished memo to the user for review and signature routing.
Throughout long analyses (Steps 3–6), check in with the user after completing major sections to confirm direction before proceeding.
Output
A decision memo document (Markdown or Word) containing:
• Executive context.
• Normalized comparison matrix by trade/WBS.
• Detailed list of scope gaps and hidden costs with estimated adds and confidence.
• Risk and schedule analysis.
• Budget reconciliation and variance.
• Approval threshold check with routing table.
• Recommendation with documented trade-offs.
• Signature block.
Plus appendices: annotated bid notes, assumptions, calculations, and RFIs.
Agentic Workers is a game-changer for anyone! It makes AI feel approachable and useful for everyday people. The library is extensive and you can create your own prompts as well. If you are ready to work smarter, not harder, give it a try!
Mari P
Key Benefits
Discover how our intelligent prompt chain enhances your workflow
Apples‑to‑apples bid comparison
By defining a common WBS/trade list and mapping each bidder’s line items, allowances, and unit prices into that framework, the process forces normalization of quantities and pricing assumptions. This gives users a clear, comparable matrix that reveals which bids truly cover the same scope and where unit vs lump‑sum differences exist — teaching them how cost drivers break down by trade and enabling objective vendor selection.
Visibility into hidden costs and realistic true‑ups
The workflow explicitly checks for common omissions (permits, utility upgrades, freight, taxes, bonds, after‑hours work, etc.), converts allowances/alternates into realistic expected costs, and quantifies probable adders with confidence levels. Users learn the typical hidden line items and how to estimate their impact, which prevents surprise overruns and improves budgeting discipline.
Clear risk and schedule assessment to inform tradeoffs
Extracting schedules, lead times, milestone assumptions, and contract terms (payment, retainage, change order policy, validity) surfaces schedule and contractual risks such as long‑lead items, permitting delays, or liquidated damages. The structured risk register plus mitigation notes helps users understand how timing and contract language affect cost and delivery, enabling educated tradeoffs between price, schedule, and risk.
Approval‑ready budget reconciliation and documented recommendation
Reconciles normalized bid totals (base + likely adds + taxes + contingency) against the budget spreadsheet and internal approval thresholds, then packages findings into a decision memo with a comparison matrix, RFIs, tradeoffs, and a signature/approval block. This teaches users how to route approvals, document single‑source justifications or policy triggers, and present a defensible, auditable recommendation to owners or finance approvers.
Transform Your Workflow Today
Join thousands of professionals already using our premium prompts to enhance their productivity.
Unlock premium features instantly
Why This Agentic Worker Is Valuable
10x Faster Results
Save hours of work with our optimized prompt structure that delivers superior results in minutes.
Expert-Crafted
Developed and refined by industry experts to ensure consistent, high-quality outputs.
Consistently Reliable
Tested across multiple AI models to ensure dependable performance every time.
Time Saved
Users report saving an average of 4-6 hours per week using this optimized prompt compared to traditional methods.
ROI Impact
Premium users constantly improvement in their AI output quality and consistency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to unlock this Agentic Worker?
Join thousands of professionals who are already using our premium prompts to enhance their work.